STRATEGY-MARKETING-SALES-MANAGEMENT
  • Welcome
  • Solutions
    • Four Streams of Value
    • Strategy Execution
    • Targeted Capability
    • Video Tools
    • Virtual Support
  • Showcase
    • Showcase Introduction
    • Strategy Execution
    • Targeted Capability
    • Video Tools
    • Virtual Support
  • Specialisms
    • Introduction
    • Consultative Selling >
      • Consultative Selling Definition
      • Consultative Selling Approach
      • Consultative Selling Examples
      • Benchmarking Quiz
    • Sales Management >
      • Sales Management Process
      • Performance Management in Sales
      • Sales Coaching
      • Benchmarking Quiz
    • Key Accounts >
      • Scope of Key Account Management
      • KAM Strategic Cycle
      • KAM Tools
      • KAM Case Studies
    • Marketing >
      • What is Marketing?
      • Strategic Marketing
      • The Marketing Mix
    • Negotiation
    • Niche Specialisms
  • Resources
    • Blog >
      • Press Release @Docurated
    • Library
    • Free Toolbox
    • Store
    • Bibliography
    • Webinar Series

Negotiation

Introduction
Negotiation rarely appears on the academic curriculum, even though it is informed by respected authors such as Fisher and Ury, Wertheim, Covey, Parker and Carlisle and others. We have conducted many negotiation training programs across different cultures and different industries, and we believe it to be an important piece of the "jigsaw puzzle" of strategic execution (Click here for more on this aspect - scroll down the page to "Partnership Negotiation Skills"). 

At Harrison, negotiation is a core competence; you can be sure of a robust, constructive and thought-provoking learning experience.

​Negotiation is not another word for "selling".  Nor do we subscribe to the
 "traditional"  adversarial approach with both parties treating each other as opposition.  This occurs despite a stated "win-win" goal, since many negotiators pay lip service to the win-win approach.  In reality, such negotiations involve a clear concern for one's own needs but little concern for the other party's needs.  Hagar the Horrible, comic book character, and arch negotiator, illustrates this in the two cartoons below! 
Picture
Negotiation seen as Conflict
Emphasis is almost always on short-term gain at the other's expense.  This short-term focus is reinforced by appraisal systems and KPIs for buyers that judge their performance based on short-term gain.  Such negotiation usually focuses on:
  • the knowledge and use of competitive tactics
  • the use of perceived power over the seller
  • the use of competitive threats
This style does little to foster a relationship between supplier and customer, and has little or no consideration of long-term consequences for the relationship.  Interestingly though, there is still plenty of this type of negotiation around.

There is an important point here.  Even if your belief and intent is that this is not the best way to proceed, you will still need to be prepared for the pressure and manipulative techniques used by proponents of this model.  See our Blog post "
7 Common Negotiating Tactics; 6 ways to say "No"!"
​

Negotiation seen as Cooperation
Roger Fisher and William Ury, two Harvard Law Professors, have done some outstanding work in what they call the “principled” approach versus the “positional” approach to negotiating.  Although they avoid the use of the win-win concept, it seems implicit in their overall approach. They propose a seven point checklist to provide some rules of thumb for principled negotiation, expanded in our Blog post called  "Principled Negotiation".  See below:
Picture
  1. Develop your "BATNA"; consider theirs
  2. Separate the people from the problem
  3. Focus on interests, not positions
  4. Generate better options
  5. Maximise legitimacy
  6. Promote two-way communication
  7. Defer commitment until you are sure

The Last Christmas Orange"
We recently published a longer paper on our Linked In platform, the fourth in our series devoted to practical applications of Simon Sinek's work.  It covers the true nature and process of negotiation in more detail than possible here.

It starts with the well-known parable about two sisters arguing over the last orange in the fruit bowl, originally attributed to American social worker Mary Parker Follett, (the "Mother of Modern Management"). With some editorial licence, we quote:
“On Christmas Eve the sisters are becoming increasingly adversarial in claiming they each need the last orange for their allocated recipes – one a glaze for the baked ham, one for a cake frosting, (author’s embellishment 😊). Their mother resolves the issue by chopping the orange in half. Both are disappointed, but feel at least that
a "fair" solution has prevailed.”
“That is, until both recipes fail, as each called for a full orange, one for its juice, one for the peel!”

For a robust discussion of this story and its broad implications for negotiation, click Negotiate from "Why?"

    Leave us your name and email address for information, invitations to future events, and early release of blog posts and white papers.

    You can register by using this form or by replying to the email invitation directly to Clive Harrison, if you prefer.
    Register for news and updates and feel free to leave us a message here. We will do our best to answer every enquiry in 24 hours.
Send
Copyright © Harrison Consulting | 16 Overland Drive | Doreen Vic Australia | +61 418 387 269 | clive@harrisonconsulting.com.au
Picture
​Kwiklink Buttons
Solutions
Showcase
Specialisms
Bibliography
Toolbox
Blog
Library
Store
Social
Follow our blog
Connect on Linked In
Like us on Facebook
+1 us on Google Plus
Follow us on Twitter


Contact
About
Contact us
Corporate web site